The SubEddington Boundary part 3:

Looking at Steinhardt and Elvis and comparing Fig 3 from S&E-I and Fig 2 from S&E-II

I noticed that something is wrong! They represented the same redshift bin but their data is very different! The more I read their papers the less I can trust their work! I stop even trying to answer their points. It is just wasting time.

Fig 3 from S&E-I 0.2 < z < 0.4 x-axis data are spanned from 7 to 9.2 y-axis data are spanned from 44.8 to 46 saturation limit is 47.2 detection limit is 44.9	Fig 2 from S&E-II 0.2 < z < 0.4 x-axis data are spand from 8.2 to 9.8 y-axis data are spand from 46.3 to 47.5 saturation limit is 48 detection limit is 46.3